Caterpillar 420 vs New Holland B95C
Heavy Construction · backhoe loaders
Comparing real data, not marketing copy: the Caterpillar 420 costs $10,000 more (New Holland B95C: $125,000 vs. Caterpillar 420: $135,000). Estimated monthly payments differ by $204.
| Spec | Caterpillar 420 | New Holland B95C |
|---|---|---|
| Est. Market Price | $135,000 | $125,000 |
| Horsepower | 97 hp | 97 hp |
| Operating Weight | 16,600 lbs | 16,008 lbs |
| Base APR | 8.25% | 8.25% |
| Est. Monthly Payment | $2,769/mo | $2,565/mo |
Caterpillar 420
Estimated Monthly Payment
Estimated Commercial APR including doc/origination fees. Adjust the slider to personalize the rate for your credit tier.
$2,768.79/mo
Base APR: 8.25% · 60 months
Subprime Fair Good Very Good Prime
| Month | Payment | Principal | Interest | Balance |
|---|
New Holland B95C
Estimated Monthly Payment
Estimated Commercial APR including doc/origination fees. Adjust the slider to personalize the rate for your credit tier.
$2,564.83/mo
Base APR: 8.25% · 60 months
Subprime Fair Good Very Good Prime
| Month | Payment | Principal | Interest | Balance |
|---|
Looking for a different comparison? Browse all comparisons →