Caterpillar 926M vs Komatsu WA270-8
Heavy Construction · wheel loaders
Comparing real data, not marketing copy: the Caterpillar 926M costs $5,000 more (Komatsu WA270-8: $230,000 vs. Caterpillar 926M: $235,000). The Komatsu WA270-8 runs 1hp more. Estimated monthly payments differ by $102.
| Spec | Caterpillar 926M | Komatsu WA270-8 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. Market Price | $235,000 | $230,000 |
| Horsepower | 148 hp | 149 hp |
| Operating Weight | 28,500 lbs | 28,208 lbs |
| Base APR | 8.37% | 8.37% |
| Est. Monthly Payment | $4,822/mo | $4,720/mo |
Caterpillar 926M
Estimated Monthly Payment
Estimated Commercial APR including doc/origination fees. Adjust the slider to personalize the rate for your credit tier.
$4,822.01/mo
Base APR: 8.37% · 60 months
Subprime Fair Good Very Good Prime
| Month | Payment | Principal | Interest | Balance |
|---|
Komatsu WA270-8
Estimated Monthly Payment
Estimated Commercial APR including doc/origination fees. Adjust the slider to personalize the rate for your credit tier.
$4,719.75/mo
Base APR: 8.37% · 60 months
Subprime Fair Good Very Good Prime
| Month | Payment | Principal | Interest | Balance |
|---|
Looking for a different comparison? Browse all comparisons →